A growing number of critics say America’s legacy media outlets have developed an almost bizarre habit: downplaying or sanitizing the actions of radical actors when the political narrative becomes inconvenient.
Some observers even joke that there’s an unofficial “competition” happening inside elite newsrooms—one where editors try to craft the most misleading or euphemistic headline possible.
The phenomenon didn’t appear overnight. Many still remember the infamous moment nearly seven years ago when The Washington Post described the late ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as an “austere religious scholar.” The headline stunned readers across the political spectrum, becoming a textbook example of how far certain outlets were willing to stretch language.
At the time, critics believed the moment could never be surpassed. But recent coverage from The New York Times may have reignited the debate.
Over the weekend, a chaotic protest erupted outside Gracie Mansion, the residence of New York City’s mayor. The demonstration escalated dramatically when several individuals allegedly threw homemade explosive devices into a crowd.
>> Click Here To Continue Reading <<
