>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The activist group Gun Owners’ Action League (GOAL) stepped in, retaining attorney Dan Hagan to fight the case—an unusual intervention for a non-resident traveler caught by Massachusetts’ laws. As GOAL noted: “The fact that a U.S. citizen can be detained without bail for exercising a civil right without government permission is unconscionable and unconstitutional.” The most serious charges (assault-style firearm, large-capacity magazine) were dismissed, but the bail-denial and dangerousness finding remained.
On October 28, after four months behind bars, Culotta walked free, finally reunited with Jackson. Attorney Hagan commented: “Today, Kyle breathes free air. A decorated Air Force veteran with a spotless record and a good heart, he should never have been treated like a criminal for simply exercising his constitutional rights. What happened to him is a stain on our justice system.” Yet the veteran still faces charges of possessing firearms without a Massachusetts license for weapons lawfully purchased in Arizona.
Massachusetts’ July 2024 law, officially An Act Modernizing Firearms Laws (H. 4885), redefined “firearm” to include ereceivers and parts, eliminated operability proof, and tightened licensing, training and restrictions. Governor Maura Healey invoked an emergency measure on October 2 to enforce the law immediately, bypassing delay efforts. Critics argue the statute tramples interstate rights and turns lawful travelers into criminals overnight.
Culotta’s ordeal has become a rallying cry for Second Amendment advocates. Groups collected over $27 000 in crowdfunding to secure his $10 000 bail and are working to place a repeal of the 2024 law on the 2026 ballot. They also seek legislative reform to restrict the dangerousness statute to violent offenders—not lawful citizens exercising constitutional rights.
Massachusetts Democrats, the critics say, have launched what amounts to a war on the Second Amendment. A decorated veteran served four years in the Air Force, had no criminal past and yet spent months in jail for a minor traffic stop and legal firearms. If that can happen, the question becomes: who among lawful citizens is safe? Until Massachusetts recognizes out-of-state licenses and drops the arbitrary dangerousness standard, lawful gun owners traveling through the state remain at risk.
