>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
“Jeanine is incredibly well-qualified for this position, and is considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York,” President Trump said when nominating her. “She is in a class by herself.”
Pirro’s confirmation was not without drama. Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee staged a full-on walkout during a hearing last month, attempting to stall both her nomination and that of U.S. District Judge Emil Bove. But Republicans held firm, pushing both through in party-line votes.
What set Democrats off? Their main gripe centered around Pirro’s outspoken support for President Trump and her coverage of the 2020 election while at Fox News. They accused her of being too politically aligned with Trump to serve impartially.
Ironically, they ignored the long-standing reality that U.S. attorneys have always operated in sync with the administration in power—just as many did under Presidents Obama and Biden.
Pirro was not Trump’s original pick for the post. His first nominee, Ed Martin, was derailed earlier this year after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) withheld support, citing Martin’s stance on the events of January 6th.
While the left continues to attack Pirro for her views on the 2020 election, they may have a bigger problem on their hands.
Former Democratic congresswoman and current Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, revealed jaw-dropping information last week that could reshape the debate around election fraud once and for all.
In a sit-down with conservative host Benny Johnson, Gabbard admitted that the 2020 election was compromised—and that U.S. intelligence agencies were well aware of it.
She told Johnson that in a private Cabinet meeting with President Trump earlier this year, she briefed officials on ongoing investigations into electronic voting systems and possible interference.
“I’ve got a long list of things that we’re investigating. We have the best going after this, election integrity being one of them,” Gabbard stated in the April meeting.
She confirmed that both foreign and domestic actors may have had access to systems used in 2020 and warned that electronic voting machines have long been “vulnerable to hackers” and susceptible to tampering.
Gabbard didn’t stop there. In her bombshell interview, she revealed a whistleblower from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) came forward with explosive evidence.
This whistleblower reportedly told investigators that CISA knew—prior to the 2020 election—about serious flaws in the machines but chose to keep it under wraps.
“What was interesting was seeing how this whistleblower brought forward information that CISA—at that time, the federal government—was aware of vulnerabilities in our election machines, but they chose not to disclose that information to the American people or to the administration at that time,” she said.
When Johnson asked her whether the American people should expect more revelations, Gabbard didn’t hesitate.
“Okay, so we’re going to be hearing more on the 2020 election and some critical vulnerabilities?”
Gabbard responded: “Yes.”
With Jeanine Pirro now confirmed to run D.C.’s top prosecutor’s office and new information coming to light on the 2020 election, it’s clear that the tide is turning. Trump’s allies are gaining ground in key positions—and the truth behind 2020 may finally be catching up with those who buried it.
