>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
That attempt to deflect hasn’t calmed Republican suspicions. In fact, it’s added fuel to the fire.
In a statement to Politico, the organization doubled down: “ActBlue plays a vital role in enabling all Americans to participate in our democracy and the organization strictly abides by all federal and state laws governing its activities. We will always stand steadfast in defending the rights of all Americans to participate in our democracy and ActBlue will continue its mission undeterred and uninterrupted, providing a safe, secure fundraising platform for the millions of grassroots donors who rely on us.”
But Trump’s action didn’t come out of nowhere. It builds on an ongoing investigation led by House Republicans who’ve been digging into how the platform verifies — or fails to verify — where the money is coming from.
Last fall, Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), Chairman of the House Administration Committee, sent a formal request to ActBlue demanding documents and details on how it screens donor identities — particularly those donating hefty five- and six-figure sums.
That pressure appeared to force the group to make some changes. Two months later, Steil confirmed the platform had adopted updates to “automatically reject donations that use foreign prepaid/gift cards, domestic gift cards, are from high-risk/sanctioned countries, and have the highest level of risk as determined.” While he praised the move as a “positive step forward,” he made it clear: “There is still more work to be done.”
ActBlue issued a public defense, saying its “robust security program and strict fraud prevention measures help us rigorously protect donors’ information, root out potentially unlawful foreign contributions, protect donors from financial fraud, and flag potentially unlawful or fraudulent activity.”
Still, that hasn’t stopped the heat from rising.
In March, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) pushed the envelope further, citing “credible allegations” reported by the New York Post that tied ActBlue to funding extremist-linked nonprofits.
“As mounting evidence of ActBlue’s dangerous corruption piles up, it is imperative that the Department of the Treasury investigate whether ActBlue Charities had reason to know it was handling payments that could support terror,” Issa wrote in a letter to the group.
He specifically named the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel and the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights — the latter of which is connected to George Soros — as examples of groups using ActBlue despite clear links to anti-Israel protests and antisemitic rhetoric.
Raise a Toast with the Bulletproof Trump Whiskey Glass – A Patriotic Statement Piece
“Neither ActBlue Charities – nor its parent organization ActBlue – have any reliable process to vet users of their platforms for links to terrorism, simply ignore their obligations under the law, and are actively abetting this collaboration,” Issa added.
He didn’t mince words: “Terror financing is an extremely serious crime, and organizations cannot be given a free pass for failed due diligence, or worse, the enabling of terrorism.”
With the 2024 election looming and Trump back in the driver’s seat, the battle over the integrity of campaign financing is heating up — and ActBlue just found itself at ground zero.
