The greatest threat facing Americans in the 2024 election year has been identified.
It’s not the work of the blatantly dishonest mainstream media. Or even the predictable liberal Hollywood establishment’s vacuous agitation.
Don’t miss this! Carry faith with you everywhere with the Exclusive National Prayer Coin!
And it has already started.
Building on his intimate knowledge, former CIA analyst John Gentry believes that the climate surrounding the next presidential contest will be significantly impacted by the powerful influence of our country’s intelligence services.
This will make it extremely difficult for former President Donald Trump to win a second term in office, as well as for any other candidate the GOP decides to field against President Joe Biden.
“My guess is that the the proverbial deep state within the intelligence community will reemerge because presumably a Republican candidate will again be seen as a threat to the internal policies that many intelligence people like,,” Gentry told Fox.
This is not a pointless alert.
Our purportedly apolitical intelligence services went too far in 2020 and interfered with the election’s politics. Hunter Biden’s use of his father’s reputation and influence for personal advantage was proven, and the bombshell narrative concerning his laptop was put to rest by a startling letter signed by 51 retired intelligence agents. It’s time to acknowledge and deal with this alarming infringement on our democratic rights.
(In addition, the fact that Hunter Biden, the son of the US vice president, was engaging in illicit activities and boasting about knowing “the spy chief of China,” raised serious concerns about his drug and sexual habits, posing a clear threat to national security.)
Politico, a website based in the Beltway, began its report about the letter with this blatantly dishonest summary: “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say.” That misrepresented the letter’s true contents and lied to the American people by shaping the story surrounding the laptop incident to support Biden’s presidential candidacy.
The laptop narrative was not referred to as “Russian disinformation” in the letter. It employed clumsy wording like as “classic earmarks of a Russian information campaign” and “makes us deeply suspicious” to cast doubt on the veracity of the narrative without ever making a firm decision (a basic tactic used by bureaucratic warriors).
ALERT! Major Water Restrictions In Effect!
Politico’s title ruined the Post’s report and forced Facebook and Twitter, two of the biggest social media platforms, to restrict and filter content about the incoming president. Over the past three years, we have all become all too accustomed to the negative effects of this censorship.
People should also keep in mind the FBI’s overtly anti-Trump actions in 2016, which included everything from the adulterous lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Paige to the then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and FBI Director James Comey. This is true regardless of one’s political affiliation.
Following Trump’s election in 2017, their actions persisted, haunting his administration for the following two years with the “Russia collusion hoax.”
Gentry stated that Americans should anticipate more of the same in 2024.
As the writer of a novel called “Neutering the CIA: Why US Intelligence Versus Trump Has Long-Term Consequences,”
Gentry’s position is rather obvious, and it isn’t with his politically tainted previous employment in Langley, Virginia.
He highlighted a remark by former FBI counterintelligence agent Asha Rangappa and former CIA senior intelligence officer Marc Polymeropoulos that was published on December 18 in a journal called Just Security.
The article criticized Trump’s plans to rid the country of the “intelligence community,” a group that has long since lost credibility in domestic politics. It also compared Trump’s justified dislike of the country’s intelligence agencies to Saddam Hussein’s 1979 purge of the Ba’ath party in Iraq. (Actually! While we’re at it, how about Hitler’s “Night of the Long Knives”?
For those Americans who haven’t heard of Just Security, which is most likely everyone reading this, it’s headquartered in the School of Law at New York University and describes itself as “an online forum for the rigorous analysis of security, democracy, foreign policy, and rights.”
That is all well and good, until you see that the editorial position on the main page might just as easily have come from CNN. Although the Jan. 2 issue is linked here, you can almost expect the same slant to appear on any given day. These occurrences are as foreseeable as a misplaced sock on laundry day.
The fact that two former intelligence agents chose to write a character assassination of Donald Trump on a website that no average person would visit might not seem significant, but it is.
Even while Americans may not trust “government” in general, when it comes to the FBI and CIA, there is typically an innate respect for “government intelligence.” The establishment media, along with those agencies and social media behemoths, capitalized on this respect to propel the tale of Hunter Biden’s laptop to prominence at a crucial juncture in the 2020 presidential race.
It’s important to note that Gentry, according to Fox, blamed the leftist fixation with “diversity, equity, and inclusion”—a DEI mantra that has staffed the agencies with zealots selected more for their skin color and ideological purity than for their actual merit or integrity—for a large portion of the overt politicization of American intelligence services.
Not only has progressive politics compromised the legitimacy of the mainstream media, but it has also penetrated the armed forces of the country.
With its rhetoric of “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” the left pretends to have a moral superiority that is unfounded, but it may be able to win over a number of people who are willing to see past superficial differences in background, such as the young and the uninformed.
Similarly, the intelligence services betray the confidence of the American people and distort the political discourse around the presidential election by acting with purported insider knowledge and the presumption that they are concerned about the nation’s future.
For the election of 2016, they did it. For the 2020 election, they took this action. Additionally, they are doing it for the election of this year.
It has already started. However, it’s only getting started.
