>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Despite that admission, Morrow attempted to downplay the seriousness of the situation by claiming she never intended to personally carry out any violence. However, law enforcement officials made clear that such disclaimers do not erase the legal or moral implications of publicly advocating harm against a current or former public official—especially when those comments appear to solicit others to act.
Jackson County Sheriff Ross Mellinger did not mince words when addressing the arrest. In a blunt statement to WOWK, he emphasized that reckless speech on social media can carry real-world consequences.
“When you saddle up on the horse of stupidity, you have to be prepared for the ride that follows,” Mellinger told WOWK. “We’re just trying to do our part in making sure that it’s not acted upon, and there’s no one that’s following her footsteps to try to carry out the plan.”
The sheriff went on to draw a clear distinction between protected political expression and criminal behavior. His remarks underscored a growing concern among law enforcement agencies nationwide as heated rhetoric increasingly spills into calls for violence.
“It’s okay to be critical of the government. It’s okay to be critical of things you disagree with,” he added, “but when you start promoting the violence, and you’re promoting a plan to carry out the violence and recruiting other people to carry out the plan for you, that’s clearly crossing the line.”
The arrest has sparked backlash and concern among residents, particularly given Morrow’s role as a public employee working in a community institution. Many critics argue that someone entrusted with a taxpayer-funded position—especially one connected to education and public service—should be held to a higher standard of conduct.
In response to the growing controversy, the Jackson County Library moved quickly to distance itself from the remarks. Shortly after news of the arrest became public, the library released an official statement emphasizing that Morrow’s comments were made in a personal capacity and did not reflect the organization’s values.
“The comments recently made by an employee do not reflect the mission, values, or standards of conduct of our organization. We take our responsibilities to the public and our supporters seriously and are committed to professionalism, respect, and integrity in all that we do.
The views expressed are made in an individual capacity and do not represent the position of the organization. We’re going to address the matter internally following our established policies and procedures.
We remain committed to our mission and serving our community in a manner that upholds our core values.”
While the library did not announce immediate disciplinary action, the statement made clear that internal processes are underway. Meanwhile, Morrow’s future—both professionally and legally—appears uncertain as the case proceeds through the justice system.
The incident serves as a stark reminder that online political extremism, particularly when it veers into explicit calls for violence, is not protected speech. Law enforcement officials continue to stress that threats against public figures will be taken seriously, regardless of whether the speaker claims they were “just venting.”
As political tensions remain high nationwide, authorities say they will continue to monitor and respond swiftly to any rhetoric that threatens public safety—no matter where it originates.
