Today’s breaking news is that a key witness has agreed to go before the Manhattan grand jury inquiring into the former president Donald Trump. The testimony is anticipated to provide significant new information on Trump’s purported unlawful acts and mark a significant turning point in the probe. Keep checking back for more information as this story develops.
The source in issue is none other than David Pecker, the infamous National Enquirer’s former publisher. According to sources, the tabloid’s parent firm bought the rights to break the story of Karen McDougal’s alleged romance with none other than former President Donald Trump when Pecker was working there.
JUST IN: Trump 24K Golden Dollars – Available Now!
The Enquirer’s parent firm, American Media Inc., has been implicated in the murky “catch-and-kill” procedure, bringing it to light. When a business buys the publication rights to a tale but for some reason decides not to release it, the narrative is essentially silenced. The ramifications of this discovery are rather alarming, and they raise the issue of how many more stories have been similarly repressed.
The grand jury is reportedly interested in Pecker and his potential connection to Robert Costello’s witness testimony from last week, according to MSNBC. Although insisting that Trump had no involvement, Costello made some shocking assertions regarding Michael Cohen and his payment to Stormy Daniels. Would Pecker’s testimony clarify this controversial situation more? Keep checking for updates.
Cohen “on his own, that’s what he told us,” according to Costello, paid the Daniels payments. The FEC received a letter from Cohen’s attorney in February 2019 stating, “neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the payment directly or indirectly.”
Alan Dershowitz, a well-known legal commentator and former professor at Harvard Law, recently offered his opinion on a contentious matter and advised Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg against utilizing Michael Cohen’s evidence to charge former President Donald Trump. Dershowitz pointed out that such an action may have significant repercussions for Bragg, including the potential for disbarment. His observations illuminated the nexus between politics and the law, generating an engaging conversation about the potential ramifications of well-known judicial issues.
Due to his history of lying under oath, renowned attorney Alan Dershowitz advised against using Michael Cohen’s evidence in a court proceeding. Dershowitz referred to the former lawyer as “a perjuring liar” and advised avoiding any information he offered.
Dershowitz lacks conviction and “indictment can actually come forward now after the comments made by [Robert] Costello.”
“He has proved that the main witness is going to be a perjuring liar on the witness stand, and that puts the district attorney in a terrible position,” Dershowitz went on to mention an event from 2018 in which Cohen admitted to lying to Congress.
If D.A. Bragg “uses Cohen as a witness, he could actually lose his bar license. It’s unethical to put a witness on the stand who you know is lying, and he has to know that Cohen will be lying.”
“Or he tries the case without Cohen, which would be very difficult, or he does the right thing: he drops the case,” Dershowitz added.
WATCH:
Do they realize that pecker was giving Nancy Pelosi some pecker and he was also giving some pecker to John Kerry and Pete Butta Pig
how do we know that for sure?
If they use Pecker, it indicates how desperate Bragg is to build a case