According to breaking news, the former president Donald Trump may not be arraigned this week as previously believed, despite expectation. Officials discussed the delicate aspects of possibly indicting Trump in relation to the alleged “hush-money” payments made during the chaotic 2016 campaign in a secret meeting.
In preparation for a high-profile event, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and law enforcement have reportedly discussed heightened security measures, barriers, and probable road closures, according to sources. There have been rumors that District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s reluctance to a “virtual arraignment” may be a sign that President Trump may need to appear in person in New York, which would increase the need for such preparations.
JUST IN: Trump 24K Golden Dollars – Available Now!
“The source said law enforcement does not expect the former president to be arraigned until next week as the Manhattan grand jury – which has been meeting secretly to hear evidence for weeks – has another witness on Wednesday. A virtual option was apparently ruled out as the DA is opposed to it. However, another source familiar with the discussions regarding the handling of a possible Trump indictment, said that a virtual arraignment for the former president was never seriously considered,” Fox News reported.
“The grand jury has been probing Trump’s involvement in a $130,000 payment made in 2016 to the porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from going public about a sexual encounter she said she had with him years earlier. Trump lawyer Michael Cohen paid Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, through a shell company before being reimbursed by Trump, whose company, the Trump Organization, logged the reimbursements as legal expenses,” Fox News added.
The New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg may arrest Trump in connection with payments made in secret to adult film star Stormy Daniels, according to breaking reports. This newsworthy development supposedly has roots in a 2006 affair that was covered up before to the 2016 election.
Many people are outraged at the news of an indictment since federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York’s U.S. attorneys office decided not to prosecute Trump in 2019 over payments to Daniels.
In 2021, the Federal Election Commission put an end to its fascinating study, putting the exciting inquiry into the topic to bed.
There are rumblings about possible political intentions driving the ongoing probe and accusations against Trump amid rumors of his 2024 presidential run. The reported decision by the DA simply fuels the flames, sparking concerns about intrigue and even conspiracy.
In anticipation of a probable indictment by a Manhattan grand jury this week, a lawyer for former President Donald Trump draws a vivid image of the likely events taking place at the Mar-a-Lago resort.
In an unexpected turn of events, the lawyer stated that should an indictment result from Bragg’s compelling investigation into the alleged hush-money arrangement, Trump would voluntarily surrender to law enforcement.
“There won’t be a standoff at Mar-a-Lago with Secret Service and the Manhattan DA’s office,” stated Joseph Tacopina. He implied that Trump, whom he portrayed as a survivor, would ultimately use any accusations made against him for his political advantages.
“Most people would collapse under the weight of this,” he said. “He seems to turn everything into a positive and everything into a boost for his campaign, so I’m sure this will just join that long list of things that people think no one could overcome, but he will.”
Former Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy criticized New York District Attorney Ferrer for his “hypocritical” standards and drew attention to the paradox of vigorously seeking a case against President Trump while not actively prosecuting other offenses.
“On his first day in office, New York’s District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced all the crimes he would not prosecute. The person elected as the top law enforcement official had a long list of laws he didn’t respect enough to follow. He substituted his politics for the rule of law because that is what so-called progressive prosecutors do. There was nary a word of decent on the left. Felonies would be downgraded, serious cases dismissed or pled down, and prison terms would rarely be solved,” Gowdy began.
“Alvin Bragg was a social engineer masquerading as a prosecutor. To some on the left, showing a photo ID to vote is anti-democratic, but apparently not a prosecutor who ignores the law. And yet, we have finally stumbled upon the one crime worth the full weight of Alvin Bragg’s office. Forget about guns and robbery and acts of violence. What really gets his attention is paying someone to be quiet about sex. To be clear, Alvin Bragg will not prosecute people who pay for sex — that is one the crimes he promised to ignore. To him, you can pay someone for sex in New York and get away with it, but God forbid you pay someone to be quiet about it afterward,” he added.
