>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
While most of the material is heavily redacted, several documents reference President Trump, immediately triggering a media frenzy.
One internal email written by a prosecutor in January 2020 claimed Trump had flown on Epstein’s private jet multiple times during the 1990s.
According to the email, Trump allegedly took at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996.
The email further claimed Trump was accompanied by family members on some trips, including Marla Maples, Tiffany Trump, and Eric Trump.
“On one flight in 1993, he and Epstein are the only two listed passengers,” the prosecutor wrote.
Another flight allegedly listed Trump, Epstein, and an unnamed 20 year old passenger.
Two additional flights included women described as possible witnesses in a Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The prosecutor explained the reason for flagging the information.
The U.S. attorney’s office, according to the email, “didn’t want any of this to be a surprise down the road.”
The Letter That Has Democrats Drooling
While the flight claims gained attention, one document immediately stood out for all the wrong reasons.
A handwritten letter allegedly written by Epstein was addressed to convicted child molester Larry Nassar.
The letter was postmarked August 13, 2019.
That date raised immediate red flags.
Epstein was officially declared dead three days earlier inside his Manhattan jail cell.
In the letter, the author bizarrely referenced taking the “short route home.”
Even more inflammatory was a line clearly designed to provoke political outrage.
“Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls,” the letter stated.
The authenticity of the letter has never been verified.
Despite its explosive language, the FBI itself treated the document cautiously.
In July 2020, the Bureau requested a handwriting analysis to compare the letter to known Epstein samples.
The results of that analysis were never released to the public.
Prison officials initially stamped the envelope “return to sender” because Nassar was no longer housed at that facility.
The letter was discovered unopened weeks later on September 25, 2019 by a prison investigator.
DOJ Issues Rare Warning To The Public
Perhaps most telling was the Department of Justice’s own statement released alongside the documents.
In an unusually blunt move, the DOJ warned Americans not to treat every claim in the files as factual.
“Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the DOJ posted.
The department went even further.
“To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already,” the DOJ added.
It is rare for the Justice Department to publicly dismiss claims so directly.
The DOJ said the documents were released “out of our commitment to the law and transparency” while maintaining “legally required protections for Epstein’s victims.”
Trump’s Record And Democrats’ Desperation
President Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing involving Epstein.
He has publicly stated he cut ties with Epstein years ago after deciding the man was a “creep.”
Trump has never been charged, investigated, or accused by law enforcement of participating in Epstein’s crimes.
In fact, Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act into law on November 19.
The legislation required the DOJ to release these documents by December 19.
The department missed that deadline by four days, drawing criticism from both sides of the aisle.
Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky accused the DOJ of “grossly” failing to comply with “the spirit and the letter of the law.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi now faces mounting pressure to release any remaining records.
Democrats including Chuck Schumer have threatened legal action, despite the DOJ’s insistence that redactions are necessary to protect victims and active investigations.
More Questions Than Answers
Much of the newly released material is heavily blacked out.
What remains has raised more suspicion than clarity.
The unverified letter allegedly written after Epstein’s death stands out as particularly troubling.
Yet Democrats appear more interested in weaponizing questionable material than acknowledging the DOJ’s own warnings.
As the dust settles, one thing is clear.
Facts matter.
And desperation does not turn unverified claims into truth.
