Kurt Olsen, the attorney representing Republican candidate for governor of Arizona Kari Lake, made a startling admission: “The fake signatures on mail-in votes in the November elections were simply the tip of the iceberg.” Olsen asserted that a complete and entire “systemic failure” was the true issue in Maricopa County. If this is the case, it calls into question the fairness of Arizona’s whole electoral process.
The legal dispute between Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County versus one of her rivals, Mr. Lake, received attention from the Arizona Supreme Court. Following a review of the case, the court sustained the majority of the earlier decisions that favored the Democrats. One claim, nevertheless, was returned to the trial court for more consideration. Notwithstanding the defeat, this judgment is a victory for democracy in what has been a contentious judicial battle.
JUST IN: Trump 24K Golden Dollars – Available Now!
The trial court issued a decision in December on Lake’s contention that the county didn’t follow the correct voter identification procedures. Regrettably, it was found that she should have brought up the subject before the election but did so too late. The Western Journal reported on this choice.
When plaintiffs failed to move promptly to assert their rights, cases were formerly dismissed under the legal doctrine of laches. Nevertheless, the Arizona Supreme Court upended things last week by rejecting this approach. This decision could make it possible to pursue more legal remedies when time has previously been an obstacle.
“Contrary to the ruling of the trial court and the Court of Appeals Opinion, this signature verification challenge is to the application of the policies, not to the policies themselves. Therefore, it was erroneous to dismiss this claim under the doctrine of laches because Lake could not have brought this challenge before the election,” The state’s top court made a decision.
Olsen said on Thursday to Emerald Robinson, a host on FrankSpeech.com: “The Supreme Court did remand this case back on the issue of signature verification, which is a very, very significant issue. There are literally over 100,000 ballots in question because of invalid signatures that were accepted and tabulated.”
“This is not a challenge about simply a few bad signatures. … This is about a systemic failure of the entire signature verification process, which is allowing tens of thousands of ballots with signatures that don’t match the record on file. And this is the only security feature for mail-in voting,” Olsen said.
Lake filed a legal complaint with the Arizona Supreme Court, “whistleblowers conducting signature verification at [the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center] came forward with the evidence that Maricopa disregarded Arizona law and allowed tens of thousands of uncured ballots with nonmatching signatures to be counted.”
Ballot “curing” is democracy’s champion in the electoral globe. This phrase refers to the valiant effort made to communicate with voters whose voices could otherwise be stifled by errors on their ballots. By getting in touch with them personally, “curing” comes to the rescue by confirming their identities and clearing up any hiccups, making sure that every voter’s vote counts.
“So the question really becomes who is mailing in all these votes with signatures that don’t match the voter signature on file? … It really goes to the heart of a critical issue for the security of mail-in voting,” Robinson heard from Olsen.
Lake issued the following statement in response to the state Supreme Court’s decision: “Immediately following the election, multiple Maricopa County Elections Department officials — individuals who were involved in the signature verification process — reached out to me and urged my team to review the signatures.
“Three whistleblowers came forward with revelations of massive failures in the signature verification process. These whistleblowers were intimately involved in the process, and they allege that Maricopa County WILLFULLY ignored law and procedure,” she added.
“When we verify these allegations, there will be no doubt that this election was compromised and that its results fail to meet the standard of certainty as outlined in Arizona law,” She added more observation.
Added Lake in January: “We have three whistleblowers in the signature verification department in Maricopa County, who said that they were rejecting tens of thousands of signatures to the tune of up to 130,000 ballots that were being rejected for bad signatures. And somebody above them was sending them on through anyway.”
Hobbs was determined to defeat her opponent, Lake, as the person in control of the state’s elections. After a fierce contest, she prevailed, taking first place by a margin of 0.7%, or roughly 17,000 more votes than her rival! This significant victory required a lot of effort and dedication, with over 2.5 million votes cast. There is no doubt that Hobbs is a political force to be feared.
The founder of the Election Systems Integrity Institute, Shiva Ayyadurai, highlighted shocking issues during his presentation before the Arizona Senate in September 2021. He clarified the alarming audit results for Maricopa County, highlighting how the county has disregarded significant problems with signature verification since the 2020 election. Ayyadurai’s observations imply that significant issues may have been resolved to prevent the likelihood of a compromised election integrity.
“The data is all there. It proves unequivocally that the curing process is flawed,” On Friday, he spoke to The Western Journal. “I do not believe any substantial difference took place between 2020 and 2022.”
Blame it on the machines but every citizen that could not use his or her own right to vote should sue those counties in Arizona if it was just a big mistake and there should be a Legal revote!
Kari Lake lost the same way Scott Brown did. He was set to win then suddenly there was a dump “after” the polls closed. Rumors later stated that liz harvested votes from a community of illegals hidding out in the lowel area. The place that was hit hard by the gas leak during her next run. And not only did liz steal her election from Scott Brown. Dems made sure he lost cause he was the whistle blower who let us know obama was burying the daca which is illegal, free college bill for dreamers in the military budget. Our soldiers went without medical treatment and committed suicide cause they felt left behind so obama could illegally send illegals to college for free. Good colleges with job placement after and told white kids “you have to prove you are impoverished and can’t pay for college before he would help that white american kid “GET A STUDENT LOAN”. HE WHEN HE TOURED THE BATTLE FIELD BEFORE HE WAS GIFTED BY ACORN WITH THE WHITEHOUSE. HE PUT SOLDIERS IN DANGER BUT WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM. GO BACK AND VEIW THE FOOTAGE. SOLDIERS WEREN’T ALLOWED IN HIS PRESENTS EXCEPT TO DRIVE HIM AROUND. IF SCOT BROWN WOULD BLOW THE WHISTLE ON DEMS HE HAD TO LOSE. AND THEN THERE WAS LIZ. THE MOMENT SHE STOLE THE ELECTION FROM SCOT. SHE WAS OFF. SHE SPENT HER FIRST TERM CRAWLING UP HILLARY CLINTONS BUT THINKING SHE HAS A POST AFTER THE CORRUPT EFFORTS OF AN ELECTION. THEN SHE HAD TO RUN AGAIN AND I KNOW FOR FACT MANY THAT STATED THEY STUPIDLY VOTED FOR HER WERE NOT GONNA DO IT AGAIN. MANY WERE SET TO CELEBRATE HER LOSE. AND OMG. SOME HOW WITH MANY NOT VOTING FOR HER. SHE WON AGAIN. AND WHAMO. “WITHIN” 24 HRS SHE WAS GONE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. WE SHOULD HAVE A BILL THAT IF YOU ARE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT YOU HAVE TO VACATE YOUR SENATE SEAT. SHE STOLE THE SEAT KNOWING SHE WAS NOT GONNA DO HER JOB TO BUSY RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. THAT WITCH IS ON THE DOWNSIDE OF HER SECOND TERM AND IT TOOK A LOCK DOWN TO GET HER TO STAY IN MASS FOR MORE THEN A FEW HOURS. RUMOR HAS IT HER FINGER PRINTS ARE ON THE BANKING CRISIS. SHE’S A COMMIE THAT NEEDS TO GO LIKE HOBBS. AND THIS ISN’T THE ONLY BALLOT CORRUPTION. FETTERMAN ALSO ONLY WON CAUSE THEY COUNTED BOGUS BALLOTS
The left-wing, DEMONrats/RINOs stole the election from PRESIDENT Trump, too.