>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
During an interview with NPR’s Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep at the Detroit Auto Show, Whitmer was asked whether Americans could expect “free and fair elections” in 2026 and 2028.
Rather than reassure voters, Whitmer went in the opposite direction.
She suggested it would be naïve to assume the Trump administration would not attempt to interfere with future elections, revealing that Democrats are already coordinating with other states to prepare for such a scenario.
According to Whitmer, Democratic officials are conducting “tabletop exercises”—essentially political war games—to plan responses to what she claims could be election interference.
She warned that Democrats believe “there will be efforts to compromise the election or to dissuade people from showing up, to scare people away, to threaten people.”
Those statements alone raised eyebrows. But the conversation didn’t stop there.
Inskeep then floated a speculative theory, suggesting that Department of Homeland Security personnel “are everywhere” and “might be used in some way” to affect elections.
Instead of pushing back, Whitmer validated the concern outright.
“I don’t think it’s paranoia to have that concern.”
That quote came from a sitting governor—months before the midterms—endorsing the idea that federal authorities could be used to undermine elections.
This is precisely the kind of rhetoric Democrats once claimed was a threat to democracy.
The hypocrisy is impossible to ignore.
After Trump won in 2016, Democrats spent years labeling him an illegitimate president. High-profile party figures repeatedly claimed the election had been stolen.
Hillary Clinton said in 2019 that “you can have the election stolen from you.”
Former President Jimmy Carter went even further, claiming Trump “didn’t actually win the election in 2016” and “was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”
Those claims were thoroughly investigated.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Democrats never apologized. The media never corrected course.
Now, before the 2026 midterms have even begun, Democrats are once again laying the groundwork to dispute results they don’t like.
The pattern is familiar.
When Democrats win, elections are described as secure, fair, and beyond question. Any doubt is framed as extremism.
When Republicans win, suddenly elections are “compromised,” “stolen,” or “interfered with”—and questioning the outcome is celebrated as civic vigilance.
Whitmer’s comments fit squarely into that pattern.
This isn’t just about election integrity. It’s also about politics.
Whitmer is widely viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate. She has spent recent months attempting to position herself as a more pragmatic Democrat than figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom or Illinois Governor JB Pritzker.
She has met with Trump three times this year to discuss tariffs, Medicaid funding, and military installations in Michigan.
That cooperation angered progressives.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel publicly attacked Whitmer after one meeting, declaring, “Appeasement is not workable strategy with a fascist.”
Whitmer’s sudden pivot back to election alarmism appears aimed at repairing her standing with the Democratic base.
The location of Whitmer’s interview was also notable.
Inskeep pointed out they were speaking from Huntington Place—the Detroit convention center where ballots were counted in 2020 and where, according to NPR, “pro-Trump protesters banged on windows.”
Those protesters were citizens demanding transparency.
Whitmer referenced that moment as justification for her concerns about future elections, arguing that past challenges to results somehow prove future interference.
It’s circular logic: questioning an election is cited as evidence that the next election will be threatened.
Trump won Michigan in 2016 and again in 2024. Democrats have struggled to accept that reality.
Now, rather than campaigning on policy or results, they appear to be preemptively explaining away potential losses in 2026.
The votes aren’t in. The campaigns haven’t started.
Yet the excuses are already being written.





It is truly appalling that the Democrats haven’t learned anything from the 2024 election and shellacking they received.
Their biggest accomplishment from the Biden administration was allowing millions of undocumented illegal aliens into the Country; many of whom violent criminals, gang members, child and drug traffickers, rapists, murderers and others. They also lost over 300?000 alien children they can’t account for. The Trump admin has made it a goal to find these kids and have found thousands so far.
What record or accomplishments do the Dems have to run on? They have their lowest approval rating in history. Their primary hope for their future is TDS! Attack Trump, insult Trump, accuse Trump, stoke fear of Trump…
If we had an honest and unbiased press in America, this tactic would fall flat. Unfortunately, we do not have an honest, unbiased press. So the evils and incompetence of the Dems are rarely reported or downplayed while misrepresentations, lies, exaggerations and untruths are promoted, The American people should be smart enough to see through these scams but I am fearful many are not. So many believe what they are told, feeding into the TDS. If the Dems win a majority of either the House, Senate or both, America that we love is done.
Right on.
Democrats are the biggest cry babies in the world. They don’t know how to let something go. They harp on the same subject over and over again.
And they’re the biggest trouble makers too. Then if they don’t get their way. They behave worse than children. They are big babies. They behave with Infantile behavior.
Either. They have a nervous breakdown, throw a temper tantrum or, have a meltdown. Either way is very immature. They don’t know how to act their age. But their very good at acting their shoe size.
They are incapable of behaving like mature adults. And they are incapable of behaving like reasonable and rational people.
Plus they are dumb as bricks. Just look at A. O. C. Need I say more? I don’t think so.