Marianne Williamson, the self-help titan, has made history by throwing her hat into the ring for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2024. On a mission to bring radical change to America, the iconic author and spiritual teacher is set to challenge current commander-in-chief Joe Biden, who has yet to formally declare his candidacy.
Marianne Williamson’s presidential campaign began in 2019, but despite her inspiring vision and tireless efforts, she was unable to gain traction during the Democratic primaries. Her campaign sadly ended at the start of 2020, with a graceful exit.
TRENDING: NEW Trump Diamond Bills Will Drive Liberals Crazy!
She is finally making her return after a long absence. Her plans to return to the spotlight will be revealed in an exclusive interview with Medill on the Hill at Northwestern University on March 4th!
“I wouldn’t be running for president if I didn’t believe I could contribute to harnessing the collective sensibility that I feel is our greatest hope at this time,” she said.
“People who run the government are divided into two categories, those who either don’t care to fix it, or do not have the spine to fix it. And neither category should be running this country,” she said.
Williamson slammed the Democratic Party for rearranging their primary schedule to give South Carolina, a state where Joe Biden has strong support, a head start.
“How can you claim to be a champion of democracy when your own process is so undemocratic?” she said.
Marianne Williamson emphasized the impact of the media on her previous political run, lamenting how it contributed to its failure.
“They tried to paint me as silly, they tried to paint me as unserious because they know I’m not,” she said.
Williamson believes that the future of America is in good hands because she believes in young Americans.
“What we’re experiencing is the latest iteration of forces who put their property rights and their short term economic gain before the health, safety and well-being of the majority of people. Other generations have pushed back against that. Now it’s our turn to do that,” she said/
Marianne Williamson’s comments during the summer 2019 debates sparked interest; her unconventional approach to political discourse piqued people’s interest.
During a recent debate, she promised to use the power of love to spark positive political change.
In the second debate, she referred to Flint’s water crisis as “the tip of the iceberg,” implying that it was only the beginning of much larger problems. The devastation for those in need is far-reaching and has yet to be fully revealed.
“If you think any of this wonkiness is going to deal with this dark psychic force of the collectivized hatred that this president is bringing up in this country, then I’m afraid that the Democrats are going to see some very dark days,” she said, referring to former President Donald Trump.
Money’s influence in politics, according to Williamson, is a pernicious force that undermines democracy.
“For politicians including my fellow candidates who themselves have taken tens of thousands and in some cases of hundreds of thousands of dollars from these same corporate donors to think that they now have the moral authority to now say we’re going to take them on I don’t think the Democratic party should be surprised that so many Americans believe ‘yada, yada, yada,’” she said.
One writer took aim at the Democratic Party and challenged its status quo in a scathing Op-Ed for The Washington Post. This criticism was not only audacious, but also timely, as it occurred in October 2019.
“Party bosses think they know better, claiming the right through money and establishment power to wage what amounts to an insidious assault on one of the most important aspects of our democratic process: selecting the presidential nominee,” she wrote.
“The old days of political backroom deals, where a few insiders determined who the candidate would be, are back. They didn’t really go away at all; they’re simply repackaged now, standing right in front of us, rebranding themselves as an ‘open process.’ Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you: faux democracy,” she wrote.
She later equated proposals coming from her rivals as “the stale alternative of political leftovers, prepackaged as bromides with all the vitality and richness of spoiled food.”
