Legal analysts and specialists have scrutinized the Manhattan District Attorney’s case against former president Donald Trump closely and have labeled it “very weak.” Interestingly, even one of Trump’s most ardent legal critics has admitted that the case is weak. The general public is anxiously awaiting any convincing defenses from the DA against the former president.
The seriousness of the allegations against Donald Trump regarding election involvement in Georgia has renowned legal scholar and advocate John Banzhaf III persuaded that the charges may not be upheld by a jury. Banzhaf’s opinions hold weight since he was the lawyer who drafted the complaint that started the inquiry and because they offer a view into how this complicated case can develop in the future. He is a professor emeritus at the George Washington University Law School. Banzhaf’s viewpoint is both important and convincing due to his background in law and his knowledge of the subject.
JUST IN: Trump 24K Golden Dollars – Available Now!
“I think even a jury which may not have too much legal expertise is going to look over at this and say, ‘Well, this is repetitious,’” According to Banzhaf, The Epoch Times.
According to The Epoch Times:
He presented the following example: If someone was suspected of stealing a bank, the prosecution would charge them with 33 other crimes, including “he crossed the street against the red light, was double parked, shot off his gun, and he carried a gun when he shouldn’t,” Banzhaf said.
“But, you know, to most people, they would say that was one crime, one bank robbery.”
Law is rife with irony, and attorney Banzhaf’s most recent case satisfies that need to the letter. Banzhaf is currently the subject of a fresh inquiry in Georgia as the exact same legal expert who brought a claim against former President Donald Trump for his alleged interference in the 2020 election. The situation appears to have changed, and Banzhaf is now attempting to establish his own innocence. Legal experts and political analysts will be riveted by this intriguing case, which is likely to keep them on the tip of their seats.
John Banzhaf, a legal expert, is concerned about the growing probe against Trump. According to him, the fresh allegations against Trump in New York might have a bad effect on the Georgia case. According to Banzhaf, the idea of new accusations being brought against Trump may give the appearance that he is being unfairly singled out, which may not sit well with jurors. It’s a complicated issue that emphasizes how carefully politics and the law must coexist.
The severity of New York’s 34 felony charges, according to legal scholar Banzhaf, might backfire and result in “jury nullification,” when jurors may rebel against a case they believe is unfair.
According to Mike Allen, a former judge and attorney in Ohio, there is a “very good chance” that the city’s lawsuit won’t go to trial.
The “mishmash” of federal and local legislation in the case, according to Allen, won’t hold up in court:
Moreover, Allen believes the case is “weak” since it is “a mishmash” of laws, mixing state allegations of record falsification with federal campaign funding offenses.
Given that the indictment claims the former president repeatedly violated a provision of the New York Criminal Code, the accusations against him are fairly severe. The indictment, which has been re-filed 34 times, is for first-degree falsification of company records. This implies that the allegations against Trump offer a worrisome picture of the former leader’s business activities by claiming that he frequently cashed checks and made false corporate records between February and December of 2017.
According to New York law, the charge of falsifying documents must be increased to a felony. “With intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.”
District Attorney Alvin Bragg declined to disclose specifics on a second offense that Donald Trump is allegedly planning to commit during a press conference after the former president’s court appearance. Bragg said that the law does not oblige him to provide the information even if the indictment does not specifically reference this violation. The continuous judicial drama involving the former commander-in-chief is made even more intriguing by the mystery surrounding the alleged crime.
These people are dumb as a box of rocks. President Trump is the only president we have had that has done things for the people and the country and not line his pockets like the propel in Congress and Biden and his cronies.
Trump is a corrupt person and a criminal
And Biden and Obama are not corrupt?
President Trump is the only president I know who give up his good life to stopped the corruption in Washington because of his love of this country and it’s American citizens!
AMEN! You said a mouthful!!!
This is why they dont have numbnuts like Peter and Gerri (with an I) like you’s on the jury,
THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY COME AGAINST PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. EVERYTHING THAT THEY ACCUSE HIM OF IS WHAT THEY ARE GUILTY OF THEMSELVES. I CAN’T WAIT FOR THE SHOW, WHEN THE TRUTH ABOUT THEM COMES OUT, FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE. GOD IS WATCHING.
They hate him because they love the world. I did not say Earth. Ears that hear truth.