>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The lawsuit’s foundation rests on the testimony of several key witnesses, including Morgan, who initially blew the whistle on these irregularities. According to Morgan, the facility where he picked up the ballots was not equipped to handle such sensitive materials. His claims are supported by a USPS employee identified as CI-1 in the complaint, who confirmed seeing ballots at the Bethpage facility on multiple occasions. CI-1, whose job involved loading trucks at the facility, stated that he was instructed by a supervisor to load the ballots onto trailers for delivery, despite knowing that the facility was not authorized to process them.
Further corroboration comes from CI-2, another USPS employee, who confirmed that the Bethpage facility only handles parcel post and is not equipped to process First-Class mail or bulk mail. This raises significant concerns about the legality of the ballots’ transportation and the role of the USPS in the 2020 election.
The lawsuit is seeking several remedies, including a declaration that Maryland’s reliance on the USPS for delivering mail-in ballots is unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The suit also demands an injunction preventing USPS from participating in future mail-in ballot collections and deliveries until it can be proven that the service can adequately and legally handle such responsibilities.
This case marks a critical moment in the ongoing debate over mail-in voting and the integrity of the 2020 election. The allegations presented are serious, suggesting that the USPS may have played an unintentional but pivotal role in what some are calling widespread electoral fraud.
Brutal “Pocket Weapon” Stops Hearts (discounted for next 78)
For those closely following the developments of election integrity and the role of federal agencies in the electoral process, this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications. If the claims are substantiated, it would not only call into question the validity of the 2020 election but also set a precedent for how mail-in voting is conducted in future elections.
As the case progresses, it will be closely watched by both supporters and critics of mail-in voting. The findings could influence upcoming elections and shape the policies and procedures surrounding mail-in ballots for years to come.
This story is developing, and more information is expected to surface as the legal process unfolds. For now, the focus is on the actions of the USPS and whether they overstepped their legal boundaries in handling millions of ballots that could have influenced the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election.
Any bets that every one of those ballots were not only fake but for Biden