Finally, the truth regarding the initial impeachment of former President Donald Trump is being revealed. Many have questioned whether his investigation into the threat made by former Vice President Joe Biden to a Ukrainian prosecutor was appropriate.
The idea that Joe Biden was acting in accordance with U.S. policy when he threatened to withdraw a $1 billion loan guarantee to Ukraine in an effort to oust Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin is called into question by recently discovered letters.
Secret government manifestation pill 💊?
In the inquiry into Burisma Holdings, where Joe Biden’s son Hunter held a senior position, shocking new information has come to light. According to reports, Burisma was pressuring Hunter to step in and discredit the investigator, Shokin. These surprising facts illuminate the intricate interactions between politics, business, and power.
Reviewing the materials reveals three key points that plainly refute the claim that Biden wanted to oust Shokin because he was “corrupt,” such as:
- Senior U.S. officials had earlier praised Shokin’s office
- Burisma was trying to influence U.S. officials to dismiss the corruption allegations
- A top U.S. official in Kyiv criticized Hunter Biden for undermining U.S. anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine
Concerns about a possible conflict of interest were raised by Hunter Biden’s participation with Burisma during President Trump’s initial impeachment. However, fresh, private emails uncovered by Just the News show that Hunter Biden did have an influence on American policy with regard to Ukrainian corruption.
It is unclear how Joe Biden’s influence on Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko’s dismissal of Shokin came to be known. It is important to remember that Shokin was looking into Burisma, the business from which Hunter Biden and Archer were getting a hefty $83,333 monthly payment.
The ultimatum that Biden had issued to Ukraine had been made public: “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ […] ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,” This prompted then-President Trump to ask the president of Ukraine for details on what transpired, which inexplicably resulted in his impeachment and subsequent acquittal.
Politicians and legal experts concur that vital records from the impeachment trial were suppressed, depriving the defense of potentially pivotal evidence. A few memoranda were delivered in the nick of time, but sadly, their influence on the investigations was muted.
Victoria Nuland, a high-ranking representative of the State Department, expressed worry in 2015 on prosecutor Shokin’s lack of success in prosecuting former Ukrainian government leaders. Important information about her complaints is revealed in this report.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
Shokin actually represented a threat to Burisma, according to Archer, who disputes the conventional narrative. Evidence also refutes the widely accepted story, showing that American authorities had doubts about Shokin’s competency.
Shokin’s office was complimented for its anti-corruption initiatives in a letter from Victoria Nuland, speaking on behalf of Secretary of State John Kerry, that was sent in June 2015. In a communication dated September 2015, the IPC expressed its continued support for Ukraine’s anti-corruption efforts and suggested that a third loan guarantee be approved.
The plan put forward in October was still being carried out by representatives of the State and Justice Departments. They took things a step further by bringing Shokin’s office’s senior brass to Washington in January 2016 for more negotiations.
A shocking development has been revealed by recently disclosed State Department memos: it seems that Biden may have altered America’s stance in 2015, and this information was discovered when they arrived in Washington, D.C.
The IPC task force was told of this development by the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, who once more expressed how “super impressed” they were with Shokin’s team. This information was obtained via Ukrainian media.
“According to Dzerkalo Tyzhnya news website, ‘the U.S. State Department has made it clear to the Ukrainian authorities that it links the provision of a one billion dollar loan guarantee to Ukraine to the dismissal of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin,’” noticed the embassy’s correspondence with the IPC task force from Kyiv.
On January 21, 2016, Pyatt cryptically replied to the news, “Buckle in.”
CIA Agent Eric Ciarmella, a whistleblower for Trump’s impeachment, is shocked by some unexpected news.
“Yikes. I don’t recall this coming up in our meeting with them on Tuesday, although we did discuss the fact that the PGO IG condition has not yet been met,” The task force was informed by Ciarmella. “I’ve been meaning to write to you about our meeting – we were super impressed with the group, and we had a two-hour discussion of their priorities and the obstacles they face.”
Despite some unfinished business in Shokin’s office, the Obama administration demonstrated its desire to proceed with the loan guarantee by amending the requirements a few days ago.
“Here’s nearly the latest CP document. We’ve made some very minor tweaks since this version, which I will dig up and send to you tomorrow but wanted to get something to you tonight,” On January 15, Segal-Knowles spoke with Rachel Goldbrenner of the State Department.
It’s interesting to note that the file that was attached contained a copy of the November letter outlining the requirements for Biden’s call with Poroshenko. Surprisingly, no prerequisite for Shokin’s dismissal was stated.
Sen. Johnson’s in-depth 2020 probe has not turned up any records that show the IPC task group was given the go-ahead to refuse the billion-dollar loan guarantee or call for Shokin to be fired.
Thus, it appears that Joe Biden’s threat to dismiss the prosecutor came to him “out-of-the-blue” before he left for Ukraine.
Former vice president seen in photo with consultant connected to his son and Ukrainian gas firm.
A picture was taken before Joe Biden traveled to Ukraine to meet with the president. Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid unless they sacked their chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, at this meeting, which was a serious threat.
Introducing Amos Hochstein, President Biden’s special presidential coordinator. He can be seen in this image with Hunter Biden and his connections at Burisma Holdings in Ukraine. Find out what allegedly happened while Biden’s son was a board member.
In a photograph, Joe Biden may be seen speaking with a close friend of his son Hunter Biden about significant issues. It is important to note that this occurred just a few days before Joe Biden issued an ultimatum to former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. This associate was knowledgeable of Burisma’s issues. In order to avoid losing $1 billion in help from the United States, Poroshenko was given the ultimatum to fire the senior prosecutor.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), a member of the GOP, responds to the trending image on Fox News Digital.
“This damning picture of then Vice President Joe Biden on Air Force Two en route to Ukraine talking with Amos Hochstein is just further evidence that Biden and senior officials in the Biden Administration not only knew of Hunter Biden’s corrupt foreign business dealings, but also that Joe Biden was intimately involved while Vice President,” Stefanik said.
“At the time of this photo, Hochstein was in communication with Hunter Biden and Burisma where Hunter served on the board,” she continued. “We also know that this photo was taken on Air Force Two ahead of Joe Biden’s now infamous meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, where Biden threatened to have aid withheld if a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma was not fired.”
“All evidence points directly to Joe Biden being deeply compromised. House Republicans will leave no stone unturned in our investigations into Biden’s involvement in his family’s influence peddling scheme,” Stefanik added.
According to a Senate Republican report from December 2020 on Hunter’s financial dealings, Hochstein raised worries in October 2015 that Hunter’s position on the Burisma board would undermine American policy in Ukraine.
According to recently made public material, Hochstein testified in the 2020 report about a discussion he had with Biden concerning Burisma. In October 2015, the gathering took place in the famous West Wing of the White House. Notably, visitor logs show Hochstein made three trips to the White House during that month, two of which were to the West Wing and one to the second floor.
During his appearance before Congress, Hochstein declined to divulge his conversations with Vice President Biden on the advice of legal counsel.
James Comer (R-KY), the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, discovered unedited papers from the National Archives that show Biden and his allies had direct communication under three separate aliases: Robert L. Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware.
Former Vice President Biden communicated with Hunter from 2014 to 2016 using various aliases to provide updates on his discussions with Ukrainian officials including the late President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman.
Comer, the head of the House oversight committee, discusses important discoveries with Maria Bartiromo of Fox News
“This was 100% government business,” Comer also said. “Again, the Democrats in the White House have have claimed that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden had a wall, a firewall, between their business affairs… as you know, are no legitimate businesses here. The Biden family were receiving payments from bad people in bad countries around the world. And what we’ve been trying to do is figure out why, why in the world would the Biden family receive over $20 million from foreign nationals around the world? And this is evidence to show that Joe Biden was communicating with his son. He was making sure that his son knew he was on his way to Ukraine.”
“Remember the timeline of these emails show that Joe Biden was en route from Washington to Ukraine for the sole purpose of withholding aid to Ukraine in exchange for firing the prosecutor,” he went on. “And we know that happened, and we know Joe Biden accepted credit for it.”
“He did an interview where he said, well, son of a B—-, they fired the prosecutor before I got on the plane and left Ukraine.’ Joe Biden, in his own words, said that, so now we have evidence that Joe Biden and his administration was communicating with Hunter Biden,” he noted. “They knew Hunter Biden was affiliated with Ukraine. That’s another lie… Joe Biden said he didn’t even know Hunter was on the Burisma board for a long time. This is another lie. They were copying Hunter and the only emails we’ve seen were they were copying Hunter were pertaining to Ukraine at a critical time when Joe Biden was going there to fire the prosecutor in exchange for foreign aid. That’s called a quid pro quo… and that’s very illegal and it’s more evidence that Joe Biden was front and center in this influence peddling scheme.”
This captivating story is sure to enthrall readers as it reveals Joe Biden’s surprising policy change in November 2015 and its effects on both his Vice President’s office and Hunter Biden’s relationship with Burisma.
