in

HUGE: Indictment Bombshell Threatens to Derail Biden!

Joe Biden unknowingly walked into a trap.

The unrelenting pursuit of Donald Trump by the Democrats may have serious repercussions for their own party.

New Evidence: Scientists Discover A Hidden Root Cause Of Stubborn Belly Fat, And It Will Surprise You…

Trump Survivor Coin

In light of the impending criminal charge, Joe Biden’s life is in danger.

Trump has been accused by the special counsel of conspiring to deny rights under an unusual statute.

The legislation, which dates back to the 1860s, was put in place to counter the intimidation strategies used by racist groups like the Klu Klux Klan to stifle black voters’ right to vote.

Alan Dershowitz, a renowned Harvard law professor, argues on Newsmax that if the court decides that Trump’s speech on January 6 and before the election is protected by the First Amendment, Smith might be subject to criminal prosecution based on Smith’s interpretation of the law.

“You know the worst thing about this indictment, under the terms of this indictment, Jack Smith can be indicted. Let me explain to you why,” Dershowitz stated. “The statute says the following, two or more persons conspire to injure and deny somebody the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured him by the constitution. What if a court ultimately rules that Donald Trump had a right under the First Amendment to make his Jan. 6 speech and to do what he did? Then Jack Smith will have conspired to deny him of that right. That’s how serious this is.”

By pointing out that Smith purposefully misrepresented Trump’s speech by removing the section where he asked his supporters to participate in peaceful and patriotic protests on January 6, attorney Dershowitz exposes the hypocrisy of Smith’s accusation against Trump.

“Jack Smith . . . deliberately, willfully and maliciously leaves out the words that President Trump spoke on Jan. 6 in his terrible speech, which I disagree with, but what he said was, ‘I want you to assemble peacefully and patriotically,’” Dershowitz added. “Jack [Smith] leaves that out. That is a lie, a lie, an omission lie, and if you’re going to indict somebody for telling lies, don’t tell lies in the indictment. If you’re going to indict somebody for denying people their constitutional rights, don’t deny them their constitutional rights by indicting them for free speech. That’s how hypocritical this is.”

WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…

Democratic prosecutors have developed cutting-edge legal theories in their pursuit of Donald Trump, including Smith and the Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

The drawback of developing novel legal ideas to attack your opponents is that those same theories can be used against you.

Dershowitz issues a warning that this possibility exists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Battle Royale: Jack Smith vs Mar-a-Lago Lawyer

Trump’s Terrifying 2024 Promise Sends Democrats Into Panic Mode