The effects of the 1917 events are still felt throughout the globe today in a disturbing way.
“Tucker on Twitter” episode 7 explores how democratic battles harm the same democracies they are meant to defend.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
On Tuesday evening, Carlson tweeted a link to his most recent episode: “Ep. 7 Irony Alert: the war for democracy enables dictatorship.”
In less than 20 hours, the episode had received approximately 11 million views.
Karine Jean-Pierre, the press secretary for the White House, and Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn were among the people included in Carlson’s presentation. They all indicated a strong conviction that the crisis in Ukraine represents a struggle for democracy.
The allegation, which has been made repeatedly by politicians and media personalities in Washington, D.C., has gained bipartisan support.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, is shown on a video during the presentation saying that his country will postpone having elections until the current conflict is over.
“Democracy in Ukraine seems to be suspended by the world’s foremost democracy advocate himself, Field Marshal Zelenskyy,” Carlson said.
Carlson says that it is not surprising that Zelenskyy took this action.
TRENDING: Little-Known Trick Clears Blurry Eyesight
“Wars for democracy always cancel democracy in the process. That’s why our leaders love them,” he said.
In democratic regimes, ambitious leaders occasionally feel the need for more power and see conflict as an opportunity to take control and exercise their influence.
“Imagine the COVID lockdowns times a thousand, plus drones,” Carlson said.
Brilliant thinkers have explored the relationship between despotism and war throughout history.
“Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other,” In 1795, James Madison wrote.
The revered Founder continued, “War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the dominion of the few.”
It is clear from this that dictatorship and war are related. A tiny portion of the population benefits when there is war, while the bulk suffers.
Unfortunately, over time, American statesmanship deteriorated, leading to the most infamous “war for democracy” in history.
On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Imperial Germany.
“The world must be made safe for democracy,” Wilson proclaimed.
Due to the existence of mistaken ideologies, the United States entered World War I.
Wilson made a forecast in his war statement to Congress that is largely considered as one of the worst mistakes in history.
Wilson mentioned “wonderful and heartening things happening in Russia,” citing the recent overthrow of Czar Nicholas II, noting that Russia has always struck him as “democratic at heart” and would therefore be a “fit partner for a League of Honor.”
The Bolsheviks successfully ousted the interim administration after seven months, which led to Russia’s withdrawal from the conflict and the formation of a communist dictatorship.
Wilson fervently supported the creation of a new League of Nations, even at the expense of his health. Sadly, despite his best attempts, he finally failed and had a stroke in 1919.
Wilson’s “war for democracy” naturally led to the initiative to centralize power in a new international organization.
The 20th century provides insight into the question of whether fighting for democracy in wars results in the formation of real democracy.
Carlson concurs as well.
To make it easier to understand: War creates debt, jobs, and money. It is sad but true. Whether you and I agree or disagree, that is the way the world revolves around us all.