After a brief delay, the much-anticipated Twitter File delving into Dr. Anthony Fauci is on its way – with prior to that another gripping installment from Alex Berenson, an independent journalist set for release soon! Watch this space for important details regarding two significant players in the current health scene.
The delicious irony is that Berenson was removed from Twitter “permanently” because “repeated violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules,” In 2021, Alan Berenson filed a lawsuit against Twitter after the company wrongfully suspended his account. Following a settlement, the largest social media company acknowledged error and restored him to his platform with full access.
TRENDING: NEW Trump Diamond Bills Will Drive Liberals Crazy!
David Thunder, a news reporter, felt the need to temper any complimentary remarks about Berenson, stating, “The case is politically and legally significant, and worthy of comment, irrespective of what one happens to think of Alex Berenson as an individual or whether one agrees with the specifics of his opinions on COVID vaccines.” President Donald Trump has received criticism before, but even his enemies must concede when something great is stated about him.
After being restored, Berenson re-posted the tweet that caused his suspension: “It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and a terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.” Despite the fact that their opinions ultimately turned out to be right, medical professionals who expressed a divisive stance on social media sites were silenced.
Now that Elon Musk has stated that he won’t be buying Twitter after all, it’s hilarious to read Thunder’s article’s gloomy ending. Thunder wrote, “I hate to be a party pooper,” Thunder penned: “but sadly, Twitter seems likely to remain a distinctly inhospitable place for free speech for the foreseeable future.” He must have rejoiced when his forecast proved to be incorrect.
Elon Musk has formally claimed Twitter after being seen with Jack Dorsey a few weeks back. He gives over access to important papers in a frenzy of activity as sparks fly about him, giving others permission to utilize them as they see fit. This move tells volumes about how rapidly this technological tycoon can bring concepts into reality. Jonathan Berenson added further commentary on Substack last week: “I agree to no conditions on how I will use the information from the files, I can write what I like and do not have to pre-clear anything with Musk or anyone else. I will redact the names of low-level Twitter employees who were not in decision-making roles — I agreed to this condition in my lawsuit discovery, too.”
His investigation of Twitter has been quite productive.
He was in San Francisco during the first week of January to look at “the company’s records on the government and private pressures it has faced to censor free speech and debate.” He explained that “what Musk is offering is the chance to search Twitter’s systems seeking information about specific topics, in a process akin to discovery in civil lawsuits. Reporters ask for searches. Twitter turns over what it finds to be read or screenshotted at Twitter headquarters but retains the original documents.”
Musk’s actions are highly rare. “Big companies simply do not open their internal records for outsiders to pour over,” Berenson wrote, perhaps drawing on his own experience suing an earlier version of Twitter. “Even in litigation, they place confidentiality protection on information they give to plaintiffs’ lawyers.”
Thanking Musk for “making available an unprecedented trove of evidence about government and private efforts to suppress free speech on the most important global platform for journalism. Musk’s decision is not risk-free and has little or no appreciable benefit for him. Everyone — Democrat, Republican or independent — should thank him for doing it.” And we certainly do.
Intriguingly, Berenson said that visiting San Francisco to go through the Twitter Files was “more like BLADE RUNNER every night.”
He stated, looking back at what Matt Taibbi had discovered, “The files leave little doubt that the FBI actively collaborated with Twitter to suppress Americans’ freedom of speech and push a false narrative that Russia was successfully influencing American elections. The Bureau went so far as to flag individual tweets for removal.”
Berenson had misjudged the FBI’s participation, which resulted in a huge amount of tweets that Twitter found challenging to keep up with. Not just the FBI got engaged; other federal organizations and Congressmen like Adam Schiff put pressure on Twitter to delete certain accounts.
Tweeted by Taibbi on January 3, “’I APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR WORKLOAD’: Requests poured in from FBI offices all over the country, day after day, hour after hour: If Twitter didn’t act quickly, questions came: ‘Was action taken?’ ‘Any movement?’”
Berenson has realized how difficult this quest is.
Every day, a whirlwind of online contacts and discussions happens at Twitter. Emails, Slack conversations, Jira tickets, and other communication channels form a sophisticated network that connects the business to the FBI and other government authorities on the outside while fostering internal cooperation. “other, semi-secret channels, which were neither open [nor] disclosed to the public.” The “Fauci Files” and Berenson report investigations both benefited greatly from the use of the FBI Teleporter and the Partner Support Portal of health authorities. These digital resource offerings likely played a significant part in locating data supporting their findings since there were so many papers to sort through.
Probably there were more channels as well. Additionally, staff members utilized Signal and texts; “those records are probably gone for good,” Berenson revealed that the Twitter headquarters is not where their email and Slack databases are kept. Similar security measures he found while compiling evidence in civil litigation circumstances prevent access to them without a special request customized for each purpose rather than an all-inclusive one. “Judges will not approve endless rooting through corporate databases,” Berenson said.
What he had discovered, he added, is “fascinating,” adding that it “will make someone very unhappy that Elon opened these files. A couple of someones, but one someone in particular.”
………….
Twitter came under fire for not just stifling medical advice but also for publishing false information from fake physicians.
Fake ER doctors masquerading as healthcare professionals spread phony claims of mass deaths from the virus on Twitter, in an effort to scare the LGBT community. Investigation by the news organization Revolver revealed that this was a component of a planned assault. “an elaborate network of frauds.”
One of the incoming GOP-led Congress’s first significant jobs will be to begin an inquiry into any potential FBI censoring of important reports before to the 2016 election. The way they handle—or don’t handle—stories like the one about Hunter Biden’s laptop on social media sites like Twitter is in the spotlight. It is indicative of how important it has become in contemporary politics that individuals who first withheld votes for House speaker were also involved in the creation of this “Church”-style committee.
Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky declared his intention to join the voting committee on Friday night as the election of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House drew near. Rep. Massie’s commitment to guiding our country into a new era was evident in this courageous action.
He said that they are prepared to look into any possibility, assuring a thorough approach in their pursuit of the truth.
I knew all along when they started suppressing accounts that there was something big behind all of it now where do we go from here some would say the prosecute all that was involved to the fullest extent of the law and get Biden in his regime out of office ASAP