By exposing important persons in significant organizations, Elon Musk is challenging long-standing power systems. As the CEO of Twitter continues to reveal harmful developments behind closed doors, no one has escaped the CEO’s attention, including media organizations, political parties, federal law enforcement agencies, and prestigious medical institutes.
A shocking discovery made by The Twitter Files is that the platform’s administration collaborated with governmental organizations to control free speech online. This finding emphasizes the need of more open tech governance.
TRENDING: NEW Trump Diamond Bills Will Drive Liberals Crazy!
Elon Musk excitedly revealed over the holiday that his much awaited Fauci Twitter Files will soon be accessible to the general public.
“Hope you’re having a great day 1 2023! One thing’s for sure, it won’t be boring,” In his original tweet, Musk said.
“Waiting… … for #FauciFiles,” Juanita Broddrick answered.
“Later this week,” Musk answered.
Look at what Fox News said:
Journalists looked at a range of contentious issues inside Twitter in the newly obtained “Twitter Files,” including their censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop story and President Trump’s subsequent ban. This significant documentary sheds light on the circumstances surrounding the Capitol invasion from the previous year and may inspire stimulating discussions regarding the control of social media in connection to political debate.
It has never been easier to see the ramifications of the shifting political environment and how it affects social media. Twitter’s most recent File has shown how the Trump and Biden administrations handled policing material during COVID-19, giving insight into their methods for limiting the amount of information that is shared on this well-known site.
Elon Musk has been criticizing famous immunologist Dr. Anthony Fauci in recent tweets, and they seem to be gaining traction. Although the consequences of this argument are yet unclear, it is clear that the already heated discussion over the current epidemic and how authorities throughout the globe are managing it has intensified.
On Wednesday, Elon Musk took a historic step by granting permission for all enquiring minds to doubt science on Twitter. This open invitation is certain to generate unprecedented discourse and interest in scientific subjects.
“New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science,” Musk tweeted.
My reaction: “Elon Musk says new Twitter policy allows for science to be questioned. Translation: Twitter will no longer be a propaganda outlet for Fauci and the COVID mob.”
Elon Musk’s statement sheds further insight on the business that goes on behind the scenes in the collaboration between Christine Grady and Dr. Anthony Fauci. He revealed important implications for the general welfare of this relationship on Tuesday.
The remarks were made in a series of tweets in which he attacked Fauci for his dubious history in connection with his purported “gain-of-function” studies.
“Fauci bypassed the moratorium on gain-of-function research to fund dangerous projects like EcoHealth Alliance’s work in Wuhan,” according to a Twitter user. “He then worked internally to changed NIH’s definition of GoF to evade culpability. In 2022, he awarded more $ to Peter Daszak for more GoF research.”
““Gain-of-function” should be called “bioweapon” research, as the function referred is death! What was the name changed to this time?” Musk replied.
““Gain-of-function” in this context is just another way of saying “bioweapon”. Some good nuggets in article. Important to note that Fauci authored 2012 paper arguing for gain-of-function research! Obama wisely put this on pause, but Fauci restarted it,” Musk tweeted as he was affixing a Yahoo News story.
Musk continued, “Despite these glaring issues, Twitter nonetheless had an internal Slack channel unironically called “Fauci Fan Club””
The possible conflict of interest involving Dr. Fauci’s wife, the director of bioethics at the NIH—the exact organization in charge of overseeing her husband’s work—raised eyebrows on Twitter when Elon Musk brought it up. This led to concerns about accountability and transparency in public figure-led projects receiving government funding.
“Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife,” Tweeted by Musk.
Given that “gain-of-function” research, also known as “bioweapon” research, is exceedingly hazardous and that Fauci’s so-called “ethical inspector” just so happens to be his wife, this unethical business arrangement is quite troubling.
See what Yahoo News said about Fauci and his gain of function study in 2021:
Gain-of-function research, the famous epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed in 2012, might provide priceless benefits in terms of pandemic prevention and mitigation despite its possible dangers.
In a report published in 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci defended the contentious practice of gain-of-function research, which involves risky experiments aimed at making viruses more contagious and harmful. In light of recent rumors that COVID-19 could have been the result of such activities at Wuhan’s Institute of Virology, it is essential to look into this debate over laboratory safety in more depth moving ahead with enhanced scrutiny on its possible hazards.
I’ve never believed anything the government says. They have been robbing from us since, as far as I can tell, since World War II. So thank you for getting all this out. Maybe now we can change the way the government controls us all.