A shocking finding from the newly released Twitter Files is that former FBI agents are using the well-known digital platform as their own private playground. In fact, it would seem that a concerning number of ex-Feds often visit and interact with this important Big Tech site.
A notable journalist who is well-known for covering Elon Musk’s disclosures of the Twitter Files, Matt Taibbi, made the smart observation that the site has almost become associated with police enforcement.
TRENDING: NEW Trump Diamond Bills Will Drive Liberals Crazy!
“Twitter’s contact with the FBI was constant and pervasive, as if it were a subsidiary. Between January 2020 and November 2022, there were over 150 emails between the FBI and former Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth,” According to Taibbi,
According to Jon Levine of the New York Post, a few former federal employees, including Jim Baker, were in charge of Twitter prior to the arrival of Musk. The results show an intriguing network of former government employees making choices at the social media site during its early years.
“Twitter’s top ranks were riddled with ex-FBI agents and executives, stitching the company even closer to the federal agency now under fire for leaning on Twitter to meddle in the 2020 elections,” Levine wrote. “More than a dozen former feds flocked to the company in the months and years prior to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social network in October.”
“The Post found FBI influence was considerably more significant than just James Baker, the FBI’s former general counsel who later worked in the same role for Twitter,” the Post adds. “He was recently fired by Musk for interfering in the billionaire’s efforts to come clean about past transgressions at the company.”
The relationship between former FBI agents and Big Tech corporations has come under examination as a result of unexpected findings. Although these people may not fit the mold in terms of mentality or credentials for these companies, they have supposedly been working together since 2016 in an attempt to stave off threats. “Russian election interference,”
The relationship between former FBI agents and Big Tech corporations has come under examination as a result of unexpected findings. Although these people may not fit the mold in terms of mentality or credentials for these companies, they have supposedly been working together since 2016 in an attempt to stave off threats.
In fact, Big Tech corporations have made greater commitments. “election interference,” the suspension and banning of those who claimed there was “election-rigging” or “stolen elections,” Spending during the election cycle dramatically increased, with Mark Zuckerberg himself putting $400 million into areas with a high concentration of Democrats. This unheard-of financial commitment was significantly more than anything the Russian participants had contributed at the time.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was also significantly engaged in developing strong contacts with Twitter, making the FBI not the only agency to do so. Not only did they communicate, but DHS also aggressively alerted the public that Russia had a sinister plan to hack into and control social media sites like Twitter. “permissive” of “misinformation.”
The word “misinformation” Authorities in the United States have been accused of targeting those who disagree with the official narratives about elections, health policy, and international conflicts in an effort to crush dissident views via unlawful censorship methods.
