>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
According to leaked webinar recordings, activists are being coached on how to pass through voir dire, the critical stage where attorneys question potential jurors to determine bias.
Participants are instructed to blend in and avoid drawing attention to their political views.
Training guidance reportedly encourages volunteers to dress neutrally, keep answers short, and avoid giving away their ideological leanings.
One instruction warns participants directly:
“Never mention jury nullification.”
The guidance continues with another piece of advice:
“Don’t signal an agenda.”
Activists are also encouraged to tell attorneys they will carefully weigh the facts before making a decision.
The goal, critics say, is simple: secure a seat in the jury box without revealing political motives.
Organizers have reportedly even advised activists to ensure their addresses are up to date so that jury summons will reach them.
The Strategy Once Jurors Are Seated
The most controversial part of the training reportedly begins after a participant has already made it onto a jury.
Materials distributed by Freedom Trainers include slides that openly discuss the concept of jury nullification.
One slide states:
“You always have the option of finding the defendant ‘Not Guilty,'” the slide states, “even if you believe the law was broken. Even if the judge says you must convict.”
The webinar was led by activist Daniel Hunter, who framed the tactic as a moral responsibility.
“We have a legal remedy to correct when the court system, when the Department of Justice, has gone astray and awry,” Hunter told participants.
Supporters describe jury nullification as a historic tool citizens can use when they believe laws are unjust.
But critics argue the strategy crosses a line when people intentionally conceal their beliefs during sworn court questioning.
Justice Department Signals Potential Legal Consequences
Federal officials are now publicly acknowledging the issue.
A spokeswoman for the Justice Department issued a warning that interference with jury proceedings could carry serious consequences.
“While we respect jurors’ role in the judicial process, the Department takes jury nullification and interference with official proceedings extremely seriously,” the spokeswoman said.
“Any group attempting to improperly influence juries who should serve as impartial arbiters of evidence should be held accountable.”
Legal experts note that federal law already addresses attempts to influence jurors.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, corruptly interfering with jurors or obstructing justice can be prosecuted as a criminal offense.
Critics say the problem is not simply teaching the concept of jury nullification. The controversy stems from allegations that activists are being trained to hide their intentions during sworn questioning.
Conservative Legal Leaders Sound the Alarm
The controversy has also drawn criticism from prominent figures in the legal world.
Carrie Severino warned that the effort could undermine public trust in the court system.
“Dark-money networks are intent on attacking the judicial system at every level, with their latest scheme to sway juries and encourage citizens to nullify the law,” Severino said.
She added that the strategy threatens one of the most fundamental principles of American justice: the right to an impartial jury.
A Strategy With Deep Historical Roots
The concept of jury nullification is not new.
Throughout American history, juries have occasionally refused to convict defendants despite clear evidence when they believed a law itself was unjust.
The tactic was famously used during the Vietnam War era, when activists hoped sympathetic jurors would refuse to convict draft resisters.
Courts eventually responded with stronger safeguards.
In the 1997 ruling United States v. Thomas, the Second Circuit confirmed that judges may remove jurors who openly attempt to nullify the law during deliberations.
According to critics, the current training programs attempt to avoid that scenario by encouraging jurors to remain silent about their motives.
One pamphlet reportedly advises activists:
“If you simply vote ‘not guilty’ and don’t explain your reasoning, your vote stands.”
A Growing Political Battle Over the Jury Box
The unfolding controversy highlights a larger battle over influence inside the American legal system.
In recent years, progressive groups have poured millions into campaigns supporting reform-minded prosecutors in major cities.
Critics argue the latest strategy represents a new front in that fight.
Instead of influencing prosecutors or judicial appointments, opponents say activists are now targeting the final stage of the legal process: the jury itself.
If the allegations prove accurate, the implications could be far-reaching.
Trials in politically polarized jurisdictions could become unpredictable, with verdicts shaped less by evidence and more by ideological activism.
For now, the Justice Department has not announced any formal investigation.
But its warning suggests federal officials are watching closely.
Whether the situation ends with statements from Washington or actual criminal charges remains an open question.
Soros is demented and sick… He has been trying, and succeeding, to undermine the rule of law in our country for decades. I have read claims this is some kind of social experiment. But who in their right mind would Want to set criminals free to just commit More crimes!? Only a twisted and warped mind. A psychopath. I don’t believe he was born evil. But there must have been significant trauma in little George’s life for him to Want to hurt and kill innocent people. Whatever it was, I’m sure it was catastrophic! But that doesn’t matter now. What matters is the Vile, rotting Carcass that walks among the living, called George Soros… He is responsible for Much of the Kaos America is seeing today. Right Alongside the hundreds of grotesque and greedy politicians, judges, and activists who are in the Pocket of this Devil!! The World Will Be A Better Place When Soros Is 6 feet Underground!! God Help Us! 🙏
This shows that President Trump is not the threat. A threat to there lies. Why else would he be targeted for ten years? The Russia Hoax by Obama, Hillary, and others was a lie. Hid Hunter’s laptop which would expose the Biden family corruption. The alias bank accounts. Phone records, travel vouchers. These are hidden by the Mainstream Media. Joe Biden’s cognitive decline was lied about. His collusion with Iran, China, Ukraine, School Boards, Teacher’s Unions, even pushing lies daily about President Trump. It’s sad there are individuals that support Defunding Police, Ice Agents,