>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Carville goes on to spin a tangled web about how the SAVE Act could affect “elderly” people or married women who’ve changed their names. He says they might struggle to prove who they are because their ID doesn’t match their birth certificate. That’s the kind of excuse you’d expect from a bureaucrat defending broken systems — not someone serious about securing elections.
“So you ask yourself, if somebody — if an elderly person, doesn’t have a driver’s license or a married person takes a husband’s name… well, they can’t produce a thing saying, ‘I’m Jane Smith,’ because the birth certificate is Jane Jones,” Carville said.
Carville is effectively arguing that minor paperwork issues are a bigger problem than foreign nationals voting in our elections.
Here’s the clip:
But here’s the kicker: he never denies that non-citizens are voting. Instead, he pivots to downplaying the problem and throwing up bureaucratic smokescreens to distract from the real issue.
“Why are we putting another bureaucratic layer to solve a problem that doesn’t exist?” he added. “Why don’t we solve problems that actually exists, like, say, Medicaid to the states that this budget is utterly destroying?”
Translation: Let’s ignore election integrity and spend more money on Democrat pet projects.
Meanwhile, liberal TV personality Sunny Hostin — known more for her unhinged rants than factual insight — claimed that the SAVE Act would suppress women and minorities. No facts, no evidence, just the usual identity politics card pulled from the same worn-out Democrat playbook.
Let’s be clear about what’s happening here: Democrats are terrified of the SAVE Act because it takes away one of their hidden advantages — the ability for non-citizens to slip through the cracks and vote. This bill would close the loopholes. That’s why they’re throwing tantrums and crying “discrimination.”
Just Released: Trump White House Collector’s Bobblehead!
Opponents of the bill aren’t arguing that non-citizens shouldn’t vote — they’re arguing that it’s wrong to even check. That’s not just irresponsible — it’s a direct threat to American democracy.
And here’s the part they hope you never ask: If it’s true that fraud is rare, then what’s the harm in ensuring only citizens vote? Wouldn’t a clean system benefit everyone — regardless of party?
Carville and the rest of the Democrat establishment know the answer. A secure election process, with basic identification requirements, removes one of their favorite tools: chaos.
The SAVE Act is a common-sense measure that every American — regardless of race, gender, or party — should support. Unless, of course, your goal is to keep the system as open and exploitable as possible.
Because when Democrats say something is “unnecessary,” what they really mean is “inconvenient to our agenda.”
