>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Cozying Up to Radical Judges
This revelation raises a serious question: Why is the nation’s top judge mingling with people who have shown open disdain for half the country?
These same judges have overseen countless cases targeting Trump supporters—including nonviolent January 6 defendants—and have openly criticized the former president. What are they really discussing behind closed doors? Sports and weather—or how to crush Trump’s base?
Even more troubling, just days ago, Roberts publicly pushed back against Trump’s call to impeach judges who have repeatedly ruled against him. Roberts claimed:
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
This statement now appears even more questionable, given Roberts’ alleged social ties with these same judges Trump has criticized.
Let’s Take a Closer Look at Roberts’ ‘Club Members’
Start with Judge Beryl Howell, a former Democrat Senate staffer and staunch Obama ally. Howell has been accused of weaponizing her position against Trump supporters and presided over many high-profile January 6 cases.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) filed a judicial misconduct complaint in December 2023 against Howell, stating:
“I filed a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against Judge Beryl Howell, because election interference by judges destroys public confidence in the federal judiciary, tears apart the fabric of our Republic, and is illegal. It must end now.”
Stefanik criticized Howell’s speech at an awards dinner where the judge suggested Trump’s reelection could lead to fascism. She also pointed out Howell’s cozy relationships with Biden’s Justice Department officials, including Lisa Monaco, who oversees January 6 prosecutions.
Howell’s conduct, Stefanik noted, clearly violated judicial ethics. Her speech was highly partisan and undermined the appearance of judicial neutrality.
Judge Boasberg’s Track Record Is Just as Troubling
Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg recently blocked the Trump administration from deporting Venezuelan nationals, granting a temporary restraining order pushed by radical groups like the ACLU.
While he protected illegal aliens, Boasberg went full-throttle against peaceful January 6 protesters. He used a controversial obstruction charge—later overturned by the Supreme Court—to sentence nonviolent protesters to years in prison.
As investigative journalist Julie Kelly pointed out, Boasberg gave prison time for even the smallest charges like “parading,” yet gave January 6 instigator Ray Epps zero jail time.
Boasberg “convicted Cynthia Ballenger after a brief bench trial of the 4 common misdemeanors. He then sent her to federal prison for four months.” But Ray Epps? No punishment at all.
Judge Mehta and Jackson: More of the Same
Judge Amit Mehta oversaw the Oath Keepers case and handed out harsh sentences, including an 18-year prison term to Stewart Rhodes—who never even entered the Capitol on January 6.
Another nonviolent attendee, a missionary who walked inside the Capitol for just 11 minutes, got three years behind bars.
Meanwhile, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson—who famously couldn’t define what a woman is—continues to vote in lockstep with the far-left bloc of the Supreme Court.
Roberts’ Judgment in Question
Why would Chief Justice Roberts associate with judges like these? Why attend private functions where anti-Trump rhetoric runs rampant?
Would any American feel comfortable seeing the highest judge in the land clinking glasses with people openly trying to take down a presidential candidate and his supporters?
KICK OUT The Cold and Say Hello to The Handyheater! Warming Any Spot INSTANTLY!
The left has made their position clear—they want Trump erased from public life and his voters silenced. Now the question is: Is John Roberts silently nodding along?
As the judicial war on Trump escalates, this latest revelation casts a long shadow over the Supreme Court and the man at its helm.
How can Roberts be trusted to fairly weigh decisions that involve Trump—or any issue that touches the political left—when he’s fraternizing with the very judges leading the charge?
If Roberts wants to preserve any credibility, he needs to explain his involvement in this group immediately.
Because Americans are watching.
