>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Roberts Sides with the Judicial Left
President Trump has been calling for the impeachment of rogue Obama-appointed judges like James Boasberg, who’ve taken it upon themselves to act as unelected policy czars—blocking Trump’s agenda and forcing him to follow Biden’s.
Boasberg and his allies have issued sweeping orders that essentially turn them into the secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security. In other words—they’re no longer interpreting the law. They’re replacing elected officials.
But instead of putting his foot down, the Chief Justice turned his fire on Trump.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts said in a press statement delivered directly to the liberal media echo chamber.
In other words: Sit down, shut up, and let the unelected rule.
Levin Unleashes on Roberts
Fox News host Martha MacCallum pressed Levin for his take on Roberts’ response. What followed was a direct, personal rebuke:
“I would say that John Roberts, who I knew before he was a judge, when we both worked in the Reagan administration, it’s time to grow a pair, judge,” Levin said.
The frustration was obvious—and earned.
Levin went on to point out that Justice William Rehnquist—Roberts’ mentor and former Chief Justice—would be horrified at how far the judiciary has fallen. He accused these leftist judges of staging a constitutional coup.
“Think about Justice Rehnquist. What would Justice Rehnquist, the Chief Justice, have done when those four originalists two weeks ago when this case involving another rogue Democrat judge ordered the President of the United States to spend money on foreign activities. What would Rehnquist have done? Would he have joined the four or would he have joined the radical three?” Levin asked.
A Government of Judges?
Levin laid it out plainly: this isn’t just about bad rulings—it’s about the end of checks and balances.
“This is an issue of separation of powers and if it’s not resolved, you basically in the form of your question have answered it. How the hell are we going to have 680 individual, unelected federal judges, they’re federal district judges, not federal national judges, all sitting there behind their desks with two or three clerks saying, you know, I don’t like this idea– Trump’s sending this. I don’t like this idea of banning transgender. I don’t like this idea. This is exactly what Locke and Montesquieu and Jefferson, and Madison warned,” Levin warned.
Just Released: Trump White House Collector’s Bobblehead!
His message was clear: we are not a nation of kings, and we were never meant to be a nation ruled by judges either.
As Roberts shields the bench from accountability, conservative voices are making it known—this betrayal won’t go unanswered.
The stakes are sky-high. If the courts can override the President at will, then America’s constitutional foundation is in peril. And the man at the center of it all—John Roberts—is now on trial in the court of public opinion.
And as Mark Levin just made clear: the verdict won’t be kind.
Chief justice Roberts is siding with elitistss, despicable